Which of the following is true regarding reasonable accommodation?

Reasonable accommodation refers to adjustments or modifications provided to individuals with disabilities to enable them to perform their job functions or participate fully in various settings. The statement asserting that reasonable accommodation can be revoked if it is deemed a direct threat to health and security is based on a critical principle within discrimination law.

If an accommodation creates an unsafe work environment or poses a significant risk of harm to the individual or others, it is justifiable to revoke that accommodation. This upholds the balance between ensuring equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities and maintaining workplace safety and security for all employees.

The other options suggest misunderstandings of the principles of reasonable accommodation. For instance, claiming that it must always be provided regardless of circumstance ignores the necessity to evaluate the specific context and any potential risks associated with the accommodation. Stating that it is not subject to any conditions overlooks situations where health and safety concerns must be prioritized. Finally, suggesting that only specific disabilities are covered under reasonable accommodations ignores broader civil rights laws that protect individuals with a range of disabilities, not just limited categories. Thus, the rationale surrounding the revocation of an accommodation due to direct threats reflects a nuanced understanding of this legal and ethical obligation.