Which method of assessment is often used to evaluate understanding and performance during practical exercises?

The method of assessment that is most effective for evaluating understanding and performance during practical exercises is hands-on demonstrations. This approach allows instructors to directly observe and assess a student's ability to apply theoretical knowledge in a practical setting. It involves the learner actively engaging in the tasks or skills they are being taught, providing immediate feedback based on their execution.

Hands-on demonstrations are particularly valuable as they can showcase a learner's proficiency, decision-making skills, and ability to integrate knowledge with practice in real time. This method highlights not just what the student knows, but how effectively they can implement that knowledge, which is essential for practical exercises. Students can also be encouraged to demonstrate various scenarios or techniques, enhancing their learning experience through active participation.

Other assessment methods, while useful in certain contexts, may not capture practical application as effectively as hands-on demonstrations. Written tests primarily assess theoretical knowledge rather than hands-on skill, oral questioning may gauge understanding but lacks the practical element, and peer reviews provide valuable feedback but may not be as direct or structured in assessing practical performance as a hands-on demonstration would be.