In objective testing, which format allows for quick assessment of comprehension?

The matching format is particularly effective for quick assessment of comprehension because it allows instructors to evaluate a student's understanding of concepts or terms through associations. By presenting a list of items to match, students can demonstrate their knowledge efficiently without the need for extended explanations. This format typically requires straightforward responses that can be graded quickly, making it suitable for assessing comprehension across a range of topics in a time-efficient manner.

On the other hand, essay formats often require in-depth responses, analyzing and building arguments that take considerably more time to evaluate. Oral assessments can provide insight into comprehension but are less standardized and may lead to varying interpretations of student responses. Performance assessments involve demonstrating skills or concepts, which, while valuable, also require more time for setup and evaluation. Therefore, the matching format stands out for its ability to facilitate rapid evaluation of student comprehension.