Any performance test should be developed in accordance with task analysis information and reviewed by a/an:

The correct choice is to have the performance test reviewed by a Subject-Matter Expert (SME). A Subject-Matter Expert has in-depth knowledge and specialized skills related to the content being tested. This expertise ensures that the test is valid, reliable, and relevant to the skills or knowledge that it is designed to measure.

Involving an SME in the review process can help identify any gaps or inconsistencies in the test material, ensuring it aligns with current best practices, standards, and methodologies in the field. The integration of task analysis information into the performance test development process also aids in crafting assessments that truly reflect the competencies needed for effective performance in real-world scenarios.

Choosing other individuals, such as an Authority Having Jurisdiction or a Proctoring Examiner, while they may have important roles in regulatory compliance or test administration respectively, typically lack the specialized knowledge focused on the content of the performance test. Similarly, an Instructor II, while experienced in teaching, may not have the level of expertise needed to critique the test from a subject-matter standpoint effectively. Thus, the optimal choice for reviewing a performance test is indeed a Subject-Matter Expert.